New blog

It's been a tremendously busy two months since council started reviewing the 2009-11 budget. Hundreds of motions and countless hours of questions and debate went into the final residential tax increase of 4.55 per cent.

Covering the budget is a unique opportunity to learn about the City of St. Albert, how it operates, council's goals and the people behind the scenes. 

This blog has made it possible to take a closer look at all aspects of the budget, from line-by-line cuts or additions, to expanded comments from civic leaders. That kind of flexibility (and freedom of space) just isn't possible with a regular newspaper story.

I enjoyed the experience so much, I'm going to continue blogging about local civic matters. My new blog, Civic Matters, will give readers more insight, background and and chance to ask questions or provide comments about important local issues.

Look for Civic Matters early in the new year.

Until then, thanks for reading. And happy holidays!

- Bryan Alary

Budget highlights

2009 operating budget: $103 million

Spending breakdown:

- General administration, 28%

- Culture, parks, recreation, Family and Community Support Services, 27%

- Fire/EMS, 10%

- Police/bylaw, 9%

- Common and equipment pool, 8%

- Transit, 8%

- Roads, streets, sidewalks, lights, 6%

- Planning, development, land and housing, 2%

- Council and legislative service, 1%

- General revenue, 1%

2009-11 capital budget (municipal)

2009: $87.6 million (includes stage three of Ray Gibbon Drive, at $47 million)

2010: $34.7 million

2011: $26 million

Spending by category

Ray Gibbon Drive, 61%

Growth, 19%

Re-investment, 18%

Community enhancement, 2%

Budget wrap: what council said

Here's a look at how council viewed the 2009 operating and 2009-11 capital budgets. Council approved the budgets late Monday, meaning homeowners will see a 4.55 per cent increase in municipal property taxes next year. Non-residential property owners face a 5.28 per cent increase.

Mayor Nolan Crouse
"Four and a half per cent is OK," he said in an interview. "I call it OK. I do, however feel that because of the [provincial] MSI grant money we're still able to do a lot of good things for the future. Without the MSI money we'd be scrambling for some improvement projects. But with the MSI money it's been a lot easier to show continual improvement for residents."

"Residents are going to see improved services, improved quality of life for a modest tax increase. I still want us to keep the pedal to the metal for Servus Place performance. I still think that's an area of watch for us."

"There's something in it for generally everybody, without it being a 10 per cent tax increase. It's an OK budget."

The mayor isn't about to lose sleep because the budget approval was not unanimous. (Coun. James Burrows voted against). "That's democracy."

Coun. James Burrows
"In all good conscience I will not be supporting this," said Burrows, who was disappointed to see council cut funding for nine new firefighters. The decision means firefighters will have to log more overtime.

"The decision of not hiring these firefighters is a huge, huge mistake. In all good conscience I cannot support the budget because of that decision. I know that if I was a parent [of a child] involved in a car accident and someone was coming off a 14-hour shift who was fatigued, over-worked … that the city council would not be prepared to spend half a million dollars to perhaps save the life of a child is something that just floors me."

Coun. Lorie Garritty
"It's a reasonable tax increase. It's not what some people will be happy with it but I think most people would recognize — particularly if they get into what exactly we're spending the money on, if they take the time to analyze that — I think it's fair. 

"It's a compromise We started out at 8.97. We worked hard to get it down to 4.55, with a lot of hard work and good ideas from a lot of people. Mr. Mayor, I think this is a darned good budget."

Coun. Carol Watamaniuk
"Being the only woman in the group here, we've finally given birth to the 2009 budget. It was a well-planned, well-thought out, well-scrutinized, well-analyzed and well-nurtured offspring that I think we came up with. 

"I applaud the staff and my colleagues on council. I don't think I have ever witnessed, in all my years on council, such an incredibly hard bunch of work that went into a budget. I applaud all of you."

Coun. Len Bracko
"It's one of the toughest budgets I've ever sat through. I sat through some in the early 90s when we were going through some tough times also."

Bracko was pleased with council's decision to add an extra $1 million for road maintenance. 

"It's key that we spend less money now than we do later on in maintaining our road infrastructure."

Coun. Roger Lemieux
"As far as I'm concerned, we took a passionate, intelligent business-like approach [to the budget], especially with the dramatic change in the economy right in the middle of the budget."

Coun. Gareth Jones
Jones made no closing remarks before the final budget vote. However, earlier in the meeting he applauded administration's list of recommendations to cut spending by one percentage point. Jones had indicated he wouldn't support the budget if the tax increase came in above five per cent.

"This is a very positive response to council's request."

Budget curtain call: 4.55% tax hike

The average St. Albert homeowner will see a 4.55 per cent increase to municipal property taxes next year. 

Council wrapped up weeks of debate when it approved the 2009 operating and 2009-11 capital budgets late Monday.

The increase means the owner of a typical $400,000 home will pay $2,442 in property taxes, up $106 from current.

Council approved a 9.5 per cent increase to utility rates. The change represents another $7.06 per month per household.

Commercial, industrial jump 5.28%

Non-residential property owners face an average 5.28 per cent tax increase. 

For the owner of a $900,000 warehouse, that represents a tax bill of $9,887, up $515 from current. The tax bill for a $1.8-million restaurant will come to $19,774, up $1,029 from 2008.

Read more about the tax increase Tuesday morning at www.stalbertgazette.com

4.83% proposal

Council will get a look tonight at administration's recommendations to reduce next year's property tax increase by one percentage point. 

If approved, homeowners would see their taxes increase by 4.83 per cent, down from the current 5.91 per cent hike.

The proposal, which council asked for two weeks ago, includes changes on both the revenue and expense side.

Here are some highlights:

- Lower investment income by $732,000

- Save $540,000 by not hiring nine new firefighters 

- Add $240,000 in overtime costs for fire department

- Add $286,000 in revenue from higher than expected assessment growth

- Save $150,000 by cutting fuel budget  (on top of $375,000 already cut)

- Lower staff benefit budget by $250,000 

- Cut $188,900 in operating costs that can be eliminated because capital spending was not approved.

- Drop insurance premiums by $100,000 (the city would be assuming higher risk)

- Cut $87,400 for RCMP staffing from budget to more closely reflect actual officers on staff.

- Save $66,600 by hiring new staff on May 1, instead of April 1.

There are a few more suggestions to cut spending by a few thousand here and a couple thousand there.

Interestingly, the 1.08 point reduction includes the $540,000 for the new firefighter staff. When I spoke with Mayor Nolan Crouse last week about this list of recommendations, he felt the firefighter business case should be separate.

"My guess is [the $540,000] is outside that one per cent," Crouse said. "And it kind of  better be."

Council meets tonight at 4 p.m.

City hall payday

Mayor Nolan Crouse will receive a 13 per cent pay hike next year, while his six peers on council will get a 24 per cent increase.

The raises, which take effect Jan. 1, were included in the 2009 operating budget. The raises set St. Albert council salaries at the 60th percentile of other mid-sized Alberta cities, as per council's remuneration policy.

Crouse will make $84,742 next year, up from  $74,983. The six part-time councillors will earn $29,560, up from $23,766.

Compare that to salaries in Wood Buffalo ($103,000 for the mayor, $30,450 for councillors), Medicine Hat ($89,600 and $29,800), Lethbridge ($81,504 and $23,542), Grande Prairie ($78,750 and $29,400) and Red Deer ($76,678 and $24,564).

One third of council salaries are tax free, as per the Municipal Government Act.

Staff get 4.5 per cent raises

Council isn't the only group getting a raise on Jan. 1. Non-union staff at city hall will receive a 4.5 per cent pay hike next year. Council approved the raises after a private briefing on Monday evening. 

Read more about council's raises here. Read about staff increases here.

Be fair to business: Lemieux

Coun. Roger Lemieux does not want to see businesses pay more than their "fair share" for the Servus Place tax levy.

Starting in 2009, commercial and business owners will be asked to pay more per $100,000 of assessment than homeowners. The plan, to be phased over three years, would see business owners pay $55 per $100K of assessment by 2011, compared to $29 for homeowners.

The split levy follows the 86-14 "tax burden ratio" city administration uses to calculate the remainder of municipal property taxes. The ratio ensures homeowners contribute 86 per cent of city tax dollars, despite the fact residential property makes up 91 per cent of all assessment. 

Just last week, St. Albert Chamber of Commerce chair Rob LeLacheur called the tax burden ratio a "tax grab," before he urged council to keep the current one-to-one ratio for the Servus Place levy.

Lemieux plans to introduce a motion next week that would accomplish just that. He said a split levy flies in the face of the 2004 plebiscite that authorized Servus Place construction.

"Businesses should pay their fair share, but we shouldn't, in the middle of it all, change the game plan," Lemieux said today. "The game plan is to take away from the residential burden and give it to the business and burden them."

Lemieux, a former business owner himself, believes homeowners will support the idea of sticking up for local businesses, even if it means slightly higher taxes.

If his motion is approved, the residential tax increase would jump to 6.04 per cent, up from 5.91 per cent. 

Business owners would see their tax increase fall to 6.83 per cent from 7.55 per cent.

Council will debate the motion once it's formally moved on Dec. 22.

Dollars and (per)cents

St. Albert's percentage tax increase of 5.91 per cent might be lower than Edmonton's 7.3 per cent, but when looking at actual dollar amounts, taxpayers here stand to pay more. (That's what happens when St. Albert taxes are already the highest in the region).

Here's what St. Albert taxpayers would pay in municipal property taxes, should the 5.91 per cent residential and 7.55 non-residential increases hold up. 

Municipal taxes in St. Albert would be $2,473.84 for a typical $400,000 home in 2009, up $138 from current.

According to the Edmonton Journal story, municipal taxes would be $1,470 a year for a $400,000 home in Edmonton, or an extra $50 compared to 2008. 

Without a tax rate for Strathcona County it's tough to make a similar comparison. The Sherwood Park News story says the "average household" would pay an extra $105 annually in municipal taxes.

St. Albert commercial and industrial

The owner of a commercial or industrial property worth $900,000 would pay $10,395.40 in 2009, up $729.76. For a $1.8-million property that works out to $20,790.79 in taxes next year, up $1,459.

St. Albert council continues budget deliberations on Dec. 22.

Edmonton, Strathcona County at 7.3%; Morinville at 5.5%

Edmonton city council has completed its budget deliberations, with the majority approving a 7.3 per cent tax increase. See story in today's Edmonton Journal.

The Sherwood Park News reports taxes will go up 7.37 per cent next year in Strathcona County. County councilllors cut the hike from an original 9.03 per cent. Read more here.

Want to bet at least one St. Albert councillor will make reference to these figures when budget proceedings wrap up here on Dec. 22? St. Albert's increase is down to 5.91 per cent, by the way.

Meanwhile, just north of St. Albert, Morinville town council has approved a 5.5 per cent tax increase. That represents an extra $129 next year for the typical $300,000 home. (Full details can be found in Wednesday's print edition of the Gazette).

And, Sturgeon County council has cut the tax hike there to 4.28 per cent, down from 7.9 per cent. Budget proceedings are almost complete, with Mayor Don Rigney calling for more cuts. (See Wednesday's Gazette as well).

NABI half-flip

It did not take long for city council to reverse course (half way) on a decision to cut funding for the Northern Alberta Business Incubator (NABI). They agreed to provide a $25,000 operating grant, half the amount originally requested.

It was just last week that council agreed to cut the $50,000 subsidy. Several members objected to the funding in light of NABI officials admitting they do zero fundraising. 

"Every organized non-profit in our community is required to [fundraise]," is how Coun. Carol Watamaniuk put it. "Surely an organization that shows businesses how to run a business can come up with $50,000." 

Mayor Nolan Crouse said council gave enough earlier in the year when it helped finance NABI's new building in Campbell Business Park.

Council flip-flopped on the subsidy Monday, after feeling the pressure from NABI directors. Jeanette Bancarz of ATB Financial threw out several noteable stats to help with the persuasion.

Of the 61 businesses that have graduated from NABI, 39 still operate in St. Albert. Bancarz said that represents more than 200 jobs. Those businesses will pay $88,000 in taxes, while NABI itself will pay close to $50,000.

If council wants to achieve its economic development goals, members should "let NABI do its thing," she said.

The speech convinced several councillors to change their minds (Roger Lemieux, Gareth Jones and Lorie Garritty). Well, they agreed to provide a half the subsidy, at any rate.

Councillors Len Bracko and James Burrows continued their support for NABI. Watamaniuk and Crouse opposed the subsidy.